Systematic review-teamet ved Københavns Universitets Bibliotek har samlet udvalgte referencer, der er særligt nyttige i arbejdet med reviews. - The systematic review team at the University of Copenhagen Library has compiled selected references that are particularly useful in the work with reviews.
HEALTH:
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., & Moher, D. (2021). Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: Development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 103–112. | DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003
Sabiston, C. M., Vani, M., De Jonge, M., & Nesbitt, A. (2022). Scoping reviews and rapid reviews. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(1), 91–119. | DOI: 10.1080/1750984X.2021.1964095
SCIENCE:
Kitchenham, B.: Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01
Koutsos, T. M., Menexes, G. C., & Dordas, C. A. (2019). An efficient framework for conducting systematic literature reviews in agricultural sciences. Science of The Total Environment, 682, 106–117. | DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.354
Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2020). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX, 7, 100777. | DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777
Hannah Snyder: Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research 104 (2019) 333-339.
Davis, J., Mengersen, K., Bennett, S. et al. Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses. SpringerPlus 3, 511 (2014).
Ernesto Macaro: Systematic reviews in applied linguistics. McKinley, J., & Rose, H. (Eds.). (2019). The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (1st ed.). Routledge, 233-239.
LAW:
Baude, William and Chilton, Adam and Malani, Anup, Making Doctrinal Work More Rigorous: Lessons from Systematic Reviews (May 18, 2017). 84 University of Chicago Law Review 37 (2017), University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 768, U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 588.
Eksempel på systematisk review: Cordier R, Chung D, Wilkes-Gillan S, Speyer R. The Effectiveness of Protection Orders in Reducing Recidivism in Domestic Violence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. October 2019.
SOCIAL SCIENCE (+psychology):
Dacombe, R. (2018). Systematic Reviews in Political Science: What Can the Approach Contribute to Political Research? Political Studies Review, 16(2), 148–157.
Daniels, K. (2019). Guidance on conducting and reviewing systematic reviews (and meta-analyses) in work and organizational psychology. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 1–10.
Hennessy, E. A., Johnson, B. T., & Keenan, C. (2019). Best Practice Guidelines and Essential Methodological Steps to Conduct Rigorous and Systematic Meta‐Reviews. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 11(3), 353–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12169
Johnson, B. T., & Hennessy, E. A. (2019). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the health sciences: Best practice methods for research syntheses. Social Science & Medicine, 233, 237–251.
Miljand, M. (2020). The potential of systematic reviews in environmental social science: an analysis of its use to evaluate and inform policy.
Spring, B., & Neville, K. (2014, maj 15). Evidence-based Practice in Clinical Psychology. The Oxford Handbook of Clinical Psychology.
PRISMA Guidelines
The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
The official guide describes the process for preparing and maintaining a Cochrane Systematic Review: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Current version) | cochrane. (V6.5, 2024). Retrieved 3 July 2025,
JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis - 2024 edition
This manual guides authors who wish to conduct systematic and scoping reviews following JBI methodologies. Each chapter is devoted to the synthesis of different types of evidence to address different types of clinical and policy-related questions: Aromataris, E., Lockwood, C., Porritt, K., Pilla, B., & Jordan, Z. (Eds.). (2024). JBI Manual for evidence synthesis. JBI.
Campbell Collaboration - Start a review or EGM
Guidelines, templates and tools to get started writing your review using Campbell Collaboration recommended methodologies: Campbell Collaboration. (n.d.). Start a review or EGM. Getting Started; Campbell Collabotation. Retrieved 3 July 2025
Institute of Medicine. 2011. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Snel, Marnix, and Janaína de Moraes. (2018). Doing a Systematic Literature Review in Legal Scholarship. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing. (kun tilgængelig som fysisk bog)
Gough, D., Oliver, S., Thomas, J., Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews / (2. ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (1st ed.). Wiley.
Aniol Hansen, TE & Nørgaard, B (2023). Kvalitative systematiske reviews: hvor og hvordan. Samfundslitteratur.
Drejer, Claus Munch (2023): Litteratursøgning for samfundsvidenskaberne. Samfundslitteratur.