Litteratur og information om systematiske reviews |
Her finder du litteratur og mere information om systematiske reviews. Desuden finder du links til andre bibliotekers SR sider. |
Sundhedsvidenskab:
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Moher D.:Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement.. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb 9;134:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33577987
Hannah Snyder: Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research 104 (2019) 333-339.
Davis, J., Mengersen, K., Bennett, S. et al. Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses. SpringerPlus 3, 511 (2014).
Ernesto Macaro: Systematic reviews in applied linguistics. McKinley, J., & Rose, H. (Eds.). (2019). The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (1st ed.). Routledge, 233-239.
Jura:
Baude, William and Chilton, Adam and Malani, Anup, Making Doctrinal Work More Rigorous: Lessons from Systematic Reviews (May 18, 2017). 84 University of Chicago Law Review 37 (2017), University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 768, U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 588.
Eksempel på systematisk review: Cordier R, Chung D, Wilkes-Gillan S, Speyer R. The Effectiveness of Protection Orders in Reducing Recidivism in Domestic Violence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. October 2019.
Samfundsfag (Psykologi):
Dacombe, R. (2018). Systematic Reviews in Political Science: What Can the Approach Contribute to Political Research? Political Studies Review, 16(2), 148–157.
Daniels, K. (2019). Guidance on conducting and reviewing systematic reviews (and meta-analyses) in work and organizational psychology. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 1–10.
Hennessy, E. A., Johnson, B. T., & Keenan, C. (2019). Best Practice Guidelines and Essential Methodological Steps to Conduct Rigorous and Systematic Meta‐Reviews. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 11(3), 353–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12169
Johnson, B. T., & Hennessy, E. A. (2019). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the health sciences: Best practice methods for research syntheses. Social Science & Medicine, 233, 237–251.
Miljand, M. (2020). The potential of systematic reviews in environmental social science: an analysis of its use to evaluate and inform policy.
Spring, B., & Neville, K. (2014, maj 15). Evidence-based Practice in Clinical Psychology. The Oxford Handbook of Clinical Psychology.
PRISMA Guidelines
The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Den officielle guide som beskriver processen ved forberedelse og vedligeholdelse af et Cochrane Systematic Review om effekten af sundhedsmæssige interventioner/indgreb.
Institute of Medicine. 2011. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Snel, Marnix, and Janaína de Moraes. (2018). Doing a Systematic Literature Review in Legal Scholarship. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing. (kun tilgængelig som fysisk bog)
Gough, D., Oliver, S., Thomas, J., Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews / (2. ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (1st ed.). Wiley.
Aniol Hansen, TE & Nørgaard, B (2023). Kvalitative systematiske reviews: hvor og hvordan. Samfundslitteratur.